Difference between revisions of "Chris Gough"
From CitconWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (rv to Revision as of 04:47, 10 August 2007) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=CITCONAsiaPacific2007Registrants Attendee, CITCON Asia Pacific 2007] | [http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=CITCONAsiaPacific2007Registrants Attendee, CITCON Asia Pacific 2007] | ||
| + | I'm a CI newbie, and these are the sessions I attended: | ||
| − | I'm a | + | * [http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=CI_Fundamentals CI Fundamentals] - The right place for me to start. |
| − | + | * [http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Simplifying_Mock_Object_Testing Simplifying Mock Object Testing] - I learned what mock-objects were in the hallway outside this meeting so much of the discussion went over my head - however I did leave the room with an idea of what, why, and how to use mock objects. Monkey-see, monkey-do. The next step on that journey will probably be to sniff out the mockery in the rails test framework (I'm a rails newbie too). | |
| − | + | * [http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=What_is_the_right_mix_of_practices_and_tools_for_introducing_CI What is the right mix of practices and tools for introducing CI] Highly relevant for me; a lot of information for one session, especially since the nature of the topic means there will be different opinions and "every tool that somebody in the room likes or found useful" is clearly not the right mix to start with. I left with lots of web links to look up, which is the most I could every hope from a session like this. | |
| − | + | * [http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Clover2 Clover2] For me, a random look at a sample tool (a test coverage metric generator). Interesting, I can see how it would be useful. | |
| − | + | * [http://www.citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Using_Dynamic_Languages_for_Writing_Tests Using Dynamic Languages for Writing Tests] Had secretly hoped to see an example of python rig testing a J2EE app in a CI context. I saw a Groovy one instead... [http://citconf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Tomjadams Tom Adams'] demonstration of Domain Specific Language in a testing context will change the way I create software. | |
| − | + | I had a great CITCON experience, definitely better than an old-fashioned conference. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 13:21, 1 April 2008
Chris Gough
Attendee, CITCON Asia Pacific 2007
I'm a CI newbie, and these are the sessions I attended:
- CI Fundamentals - The right place for me to start.
- Simplifying Mock Object Testing - I learned what mock-objects were in the hallway outside this meeting so much of the discussion went over my head - however I did leave the room with an idea of what, why, and how to use mock objects. Monkey-see, monkey-do. The next step on that journey will probably be to sniff out the mockery in the rails test framework (I'm a rails newbie too).
- What is the right mix of practices and tools for introducing CI Highly relevant for me; a lot of information for one session, especially since the nature of the topic means there will be different opinions and "every tool that somebody in the room likes or found useful" is clearly not the right mix to start with. I left with lots of web links to look up, which is the most I could every hope from a session like this.
- Clover2 For me, a random look at a sample tool (a test coverage metric generator). Interesting, I can see how it would be useful.
- Using Dynamic Languages for Writing Tests Had secretly hoped to see an example of python rig testing a J2EE app in a CI context. I saw a Groovy one instead... Tom Adams' demonstration of Domain Specific Language in a testing context will change the way I create software.
I had a great CITCON experience, definitely better than an old-fashioned conference.
